He claims that a "measure of restraint" needs to be shown because scientific discoveries and creations are potentially too dangerous. With references to cesium-137, to radium, and to a luminescent plant with animal genes, Raymo conveys his point clearly: without proper caution for scientific discoveries and experiments, the "instrument of healing" will become the "instrument of death". However, the same "fast buck" that motivated someone to sell radioactive cesium-137 will drive the scientists of today to continue to perform dangerous experiments. Even though these new tests and trials might be harmful and breach the given laws of nature, the superego of a scientist says "you're doing good for the community- for the world!" and the id of a scientist just laughs- because it has motivated a person to fulfill his selfish desires for fame, fortune, and domination of nature.
Unfortunately, it's true that scientists will continue experimenting with dangerous things so they can try to achieve wealth and notoriety. I like how you alluded to Freud; it provides ethos for your argument. Nice job!
ReplyDeleteI like your reference to Freud. Your intertwining of psychology and Raymo's piece creates a humorous and creative portrayal of the minds of the scientists. Cool post!
ReplyDeleteI feel that sometimes the possibility of discover needs to be weighed out between benefits and harmful side effects. Caution must be taken to prevent more disastrous consequences.
ReplyDelete